Civil Rights

Civil Rights: $1,800,000.00 (Settlement)

03.27.13

Plaintiff, a 29 year old man, was assaulted by other inmates and seriously and permanently injured while he was in custody in a County jail. A  gang members assaulted Plaintiff, rendering him unconscious.  Plaintiff suffered severe brain damage and will probably be bed-ridden for the rest of his life. Plaintiff claimed that defendants were deliberately indifferent to the serious danger faced by every Caucasian inmate in that jail.  Plaintiff claims that in the dormitories of the County Jail where Plaintiff was an inmate, inmate on inmate violence is a daily occurrence, with the members of the gang that attacked Plaintiff effectively in charge of the jail.

The results of every case is dependent upon the specific facts of the case and the results will differ if based on different facts.

Civil Rights: $2,605,632.02 (Plus $18,000.00 in Punitive Damages,$840,000.00 in Attorneys’ Fees, and $50,000.00 in Costs) (Jury Verdict)

03.27.13

Plaintiff was arrested due to alcohol intoxication and put alone in a detoxification cell to sober up. About an hour later, Defendants put a belligerent and combative drunk in the cell with him. The other inmate stomped on Plaintiff’s face and head several times causing a traumatic brain injury. Plaintiff was hospitalized for more than five weeks. Plaintiff gradually recovered much of his mental and physical function, but claimed that some mental impairment remained. Plaintiff alleged claims pursuant to 42 U.S.C. § 1983, alleging Defendants violated his Fourth and Fourteenth Amendment rights when they failed to protect him from a life threatening beating he suffered at the hands of another inmate in the jail detoxification cell. Plaintiff asserted that the defendants did not monitor what happened in the cell and did not act in a timely manner to stop the inmate from continuing his lethal attack on Plaintiff. Defendants denied Plaintiff’s allegations and asserted that they acted reasonably and lawfully. In addition, Defendants disputed the nature and extent of Plaintiff’s injuries.

The results of every case is dependent upon the specific facts of the case and the results will differ if based on different facts.